Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.

K&N 63 vs 77

1 reading
15K views 10 replies 10 participants last post by  JLarsen45  
#1 ·
Hey guys, so i'm looking to put in an order for a CAI today... deciding between the K&N 63 and 77. Does anyone have either of these in their truck and want to add their 2 cents and experience for me? From what I've gathered the 77 has a metal pipe and the 63 plastic ..so there is more heat with the 77 giving you a little less HP but probably nothing too noticeable but it looks better under the hood. Can anyone comment on the power and sound of their 63 or 77 series? Thanks all.

***For a 2015 Silverado Midnight Edition
 
#2 ·
I'd save money and go with a airaid mit and a high flow filter.

But if I had to pick between the two you listed, I'd get the plastic one. I think it would blend in better under the hood and not stick out woth glaring chrome, which imo would look out of place.
 
#3 ·
Unfortunate that the K&N 63 series no longer comes with a lid on the top. I know they supposedly seal against the hood insulation, but still.....

Line the airbox shielding with chrome insulating foil and pretend you have a CAI!
 
#4 ·
Not too sure what big blue is talking about the 63 series doesn't have a lid. I'm running the 63-3070 on my truck. I'm loving it. Sounds unreal when you need to accelorate to speed and when it kicks down to v4 it's got a little rumble to it.
 
#5 ·
I had the 63 FIPK on my 05 great intake..did everything it was supposed to. I put a 77 on my 15..to me a chrome metal tube reflects the heat better or as they say in the biz...less heat sink. It's performs well and sounds great as well. I don't think you could go wrong with either.
 
#6 ·
I would go with an AIRAID MIT and high flow filter too. But it you're sticking to K&N, the 63. The 77 is useless with that metal pipe.
 
Save
#8 ·
#9 ·
Don't waste your money on those aftermarket air intakes that supply warmer air than the OEM box.

Your truck came off the assembly line with a "CAI" and flows well. The restriction comes from the built in sound deadening chambers in the OEM air tube. Replace only the air tube with a smooth aftermarket tube from AirAid and you'll be set at a fraction of the cost. That setup on the GMT-900 out performed all but 1 aftermarket CAI's and also supplied cooler air. The only system that worked better than the OEM box and paper filter with the AirAid tube was Cold Air Inductions. That's the only aftermarket system that did show slight gains over the factory setup. The results on the K2 will be the same. If you want a complete kit and not just the tube (that's all you really need) Cold Air Inductions is the only way to go and that's been proven. Spending a few hundred ror warmer air makes no sense at all.
 
Save
#11 · (Edited by Moderator)
This is what the 77 looks like installed. I swapped out the filter for a K&N's Dry-Flow filter from their BlackHawk model.
It sounds good, but I don't know if it does much more than that.

20141230_143258.jpg
 

Attachments

Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.